From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Fraise_frame still makes frames visible Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:12 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271388571 4515 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2010 03:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:29:31 +0000 (UTC) To: "emacs-devel@gnu.org devel" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 16 05:29:28 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2cFC-0003GW-1N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:29:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2cFB-00056J-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2cF6-00054t-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40305 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2cF5-00053h-1G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2cF3-0000oR-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:58357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2cF3-0000oD-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so1104353vws.0 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=Rv8kUw3GL8GJnhCZlF3QZBNk4PNwPtZsg5TDY2R1UGQ=; b=fgxufMC8Zm7XBKr3t9ycrW86EMvprN+mibKUmGsf/wz81zePoBCd9KBrYWLA1tjISz LuACaWryAl6sn9l3QEMu0Dh3gqn0VfesooT/kipKZ5fApHxqlFY5jBH3SMNvFqbCzI9K +XKA2hgQvvqp/7g38nk7TPiAD9eX2lH8Ny1+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; b=V2XESkogTB9poF1AhWwVskj6yRiSeW0KGA/3M1m+J1DzZQbXk58v+PQKPD/v5u/nZ1 cF9KutDdhBlHuZ7Zaou/uK5OMtqw2HkfopwJXZ1/dEwzEVST5xOOC8scW6z1L7iEPKaX rTRlxpxUiPTcYmLlj7uM72iA1QXz5CRduYXSk= Original-Received: by 10.220.107.71 with SMTP id a7mr571603vcp.111.1271388556257; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.42] (pool-96-236-188-251.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [96.236.188.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z13sm1256894vco.18.2010.04.15.20.29.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:29:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123744 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > >>> frame.c: > >>> Fraise_frame: do not make invisible frames visible (Stefan = Monnier). > >> This is not OK for 23.1. It might be good to try it for 23.2. > >> Also I think your other changes should make it unnecessary for the > >> problem we're trying to fix. > > As above. >=20 > I intend to install it myself for Emacs-23.2. No need for a bug = report > for that, I think. (from: http://debbugs.gnu.org/db/33/3303.html) Seems like this never made it into 23.2. Perhaps now, for 24? One should go over all occurrences of raise-frame to make sure they are = not intended to make an invisible frame visible.