From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5122: Mismatched parentheses when dealing with huge buffercontent Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:26:08 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87ocmdw33d.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <838wdhjdpj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310578055 23147 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 17:27:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Chong Yidong' , 'MON KEY' , 5122@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" , "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 13 19:27:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3Dd-0006kx-VG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:27:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47347 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3Dc-0000NC-La for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3DE-0000MH-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3DC-0000vj-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3DC-0000ve-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3DB-0007KF-PH; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5122 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 5122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5122.131057798928108 (code B ref 5122); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2011 17:26:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3Cd-0007JJ-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh3Cc-0007J5-8v for 5122@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:26:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet22.oracle.com (rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p6DHQH4D001859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:19 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by rtcsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6DHQF9s022283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:26:16 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt105.oracle.com (abhmt105.oracle.com [141.146.116.57]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6DHQ8MW025249; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:26:08 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcxBebm+h5+eloKNT2qhKzDShF01pAAAIKVgAAHA9LA= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4E1DD53C.004C:SCFSTAT5015188, ss=1, re=-4.000, fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:27:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48890 Archived-At: > Stefan says what "clearly, the only real answer" is. > He says that can be tried, and he makes a suggestion how. > > So why, if that is clearly the answer, do you close the bug? > Makes no sense. Is the goal just to close bugs or to fix the problem? > Is someone getting paid by the bug closure or something? ;-) And why close it as `fixed' if Emacs Dev will not fix it? The problem reported is still there, AFAIK. Why not `wontfix'?