block folding - should this work?

block folding - should this work?

[Robert Nikander]

I started reading about “blocks" in the manual. I wanted a chunk of text that I could hide, so I tried this:

* Test
Some text
#+BEGIN 
Hide this
#+END

Hitting TAB on the BEGIN line does nothing. But if I add a blank line before it, then hitting TAB hides and shows the block. Is that a bug? Or am I doing it wrong? Seems like it should work without the blank line.

* Test
Some text

#+BEGIN 
Hide this
#+END

M-x org-version => 9.5.1.

Re: block folding - should this work?

[tomas]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 04:21:58PM -0500, Robert Nikander wrote:
> I started reading about “blocks" in the manual. I wanted a chunk of text that I could hide, so I tried this:
> 
> * Test
> Some text
> #+BEGIN 
> Hide this
> #+END
> 
> Hitting TAB on the BEGIN line does nothing. But if I add a blank line before it, then hitting TAB hides and shows the block. Is that a bug? Or am I doing it wrong? Seems like it should work without the blank line.
> 
> * Test
> Some text
> 
> #+BEGIN 
> Hide this
> #+END
> 
> M-x org-version => 9.5.1.

Ah. You have to decide on a concrete /kind/ of block.
So try:

  #+begin_example
  This is a small example
  with two lines
  #+end_example

(BTW. I seem to remember that Org prefers to spell those things in lower
case these days, as in my example).

There are some block kinds which Org "knows about" and treats specially,
like _example, _quote, _center, _src and so on.

Cheers
-- 
t

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[PATCH] org-element--current-element: Fix #+BEGIN$ parsed as special block

[Ihor Radchenko]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 693 bytes --]

Robert Nikander <robert.nikander@icloud.com> writes:

> Hitting TAB on the BEGIN line does nothing. But if I add a blank line before it, then hitting TAB hides and shows the block. Is that a bug? Or am I doing it wrong? Seems like it should work without the blank line.
>
> * Test
> Some text
>
> #+BEGIN 
> Hide this
> #+END
>
> M-x org-version => 9.5.1.

This last case is actually a bug. As Tomas pointed, Org blocks have
slightly different syntax: either #+begin_something or #+begin:
typeofblock. The fact that you can fold the #+BEGIN..#+END in your
second case should not happen.

The fix is attached.

Nicolas,
Let me know if I miss something about special block parsing.

Best,
Ihor


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-org-element-current-element-Fix-BEGIN-parsed-as-spec.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1192 bytes --]

From 289afdb9672eadaea119ebb2b0deecff4db3aa89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <289afdb9672eadaea119ebb2b0deecff4db3aa89.1640530104.git.yantar92@gmail.com>
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:45:36 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] org-element--current-element: Fix #+BEGIN$ parsed as special
 block

* lisp/org-element.el (org-element--current-element): Use
`org-element-dynamic-block-open-re' to match blocks.

Reported in https://list.orgmode.org/Ycay4s3iAdEGSwgt@tuxteam.de/T/#t
---
 lisp/org-element.el | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lisp/org-element.el b/lisp/org-element.el
index eac39d429..ce251da38 100644
--- a/lisp/org-element.el
+++ b/lisp/org-element.el
@@ -4266,7 +4266,7 @@ (defun org-element--current-element (limit &optional granularity mode structure
 	            ((looking-at "CALL:")
 		     (beginning-of-line)
 		     (org-element-babel-call-parser limit affiliated))
-	            ((looking-at "BEGIN:? ")
+	            ((looking-at org-element-dynamic-block-open-re)
 		     (beginning-of-line)
 		     (org-element-dynamic-block-parser limit affiliated))
 	            ((looking-at "\\S-+:")
-- 
2.32.0

Re: [PATCH] org-element--current-element: Fix #+BEGIN$ parsed as special block

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas,
> Let me know if I miss something about special block parsing.

LGTM! Thanks.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: block folding - should this work?

[Tim Cross]

Robert Nikander <robert.nikander@icloud.com> writes:

> I started reading about “blocks" in the manual. I wanted a chunk of text that I could hide, so I tried this:
>
> * Test
> Some text
> #+BEGIN 
> Hide this
> #+END
>
> Hitting TAB on the BEGIN line does nothing. But if I add a blank line before it,
> then hitting TAB hides and shows the block. Is that a bug? Or am I doing it
> wrong? Seems like it should work without the blank line.
>
> * Test
> Some text
>
> #+BEGIN 
> Hide this
> #+END
>
> M-x org-version => 9.5.1.

The problem here is that your blocks are not correctly specified. If you
run M-x org-lint on your example, it will tell you the blocks may not be
correctly specified. You need to tell org what sort of block it is. Org
supports a number of different block types, such as source code blocks
(#+begin_src/#+end_src), example blocks (#+begin_example/#+end_example),
centred blocks (#+begin_center/#+end_center) etc. You can use C-c C-, to
run the command org-insert-structured-template to select the block type.
If you first highlight the region, it will be wrapped in the block you
select.

Re: [PATCH] org-element--current-element: Fix #+BEGIN$ parsed as special block

[Ihor Radchenko]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas,
>> Let me know if I miss something about special block parsing.
>
> LGTM! Thanks.

Applied onto main as e5e7ae36c.

I changed the patch as org-element-dynamic-block-open-re is matching
from bol.

Also, I fixed one broken test that assumed
#+BEGIN:
Paragraph
to be a full paragraph, not a sequence of keyword + paragraph.

Best,
Ihor