From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15138: revno: 114089 change causes cjk characters not shown correctly Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 19:25:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hadzidj0.fsf@gnu.org> <7F96315D-1DED-4D34-BA84-73BC9BAF0E77@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378401978 20286 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2013 17:26:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15138@debbugs.gnu.org, darren.hoo@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 05 19:26:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJw-0004l8-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 19:26:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32959 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJw-0007S1-7b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJo-0007Rr-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJi-0003LJ-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJi-0003LF-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdJh-00067f-SE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jan =?UTF-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15138 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15138-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15138.137840191523471 (code B ref 15138); Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15138) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2013 17:25:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdIv-00066S-Tm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.bdtv.se ([176.10.222.34]:47331) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VHdIs-00066I-97 for 15138@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:25:12 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 14788 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2013 17:25:08 -0000 Original-Received: from h-46-59-42-57.na.cust.bahnhof.se (HELO coolsville.localdomain) (boel.djarv@bdtv.se@46.59.42.57) by mail01.bdtv.se with ESMTPA; 5 Sep 2013 17:25:08 -0000 Original-Received: from [172.20.199.13] (unknown [172.20.199.13]) by coolsville.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CEB31A0235; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:25:08 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:78012 Archived-At: Hello. 5 sep 2013 kl. 19:04 skrev Stefan Monnier : >> I don't know, I never had that situation. I guess if the goal is to = show >> same glyphs, ascii_face->font is a better choice. But if it is to >> have a consistent look with the surrounding text, it it not. >> Consider a buffer where only =E3=81=82=E3=81=84=E3=81=86=E2=80=A2 is = entered. I would assume the >> current font would be a better choice in this case. >=20 > Seeking a "consistent look" is good, but I think doing it this way is > a hack (consider the case where you have =E2=80=A2=E3=81=82=E3=81=84=E3=81= =86 instead). >=20 One can always construct cases that favors one or the other approach. Let possible bug reports sort this out, one can hope they are based on = real usage and not thought out examples. Jan D.