From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: Emacs freezes every now and then on my windows 7 pc Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 22:47:06 -0700 Message-ID: References: <2f00df9a-2b69-46e0-b3df-e09ca4b0a295@googlegroups.com><836291caqf.fsf@gnu.org> <818vdx0x1h.fsf@gmail.com><1B758CD9545840F1A7FA3D6786813465@us.oracle.com><831ujocwiu.fsf@gnu.org> <7b3de0ad-cdd4-4766-ad4a-7aa421bfa813@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344059247 12205 80.91.229.3 (4 Aug 2012 05:47:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 05:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kjambunathan@gmail.com To: "'Jason Rumney'" , Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 07:47:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SxXCv-00017n-PG for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 07:47:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxXCv-0005dw-6Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:47:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxXCq-0005dp-5q for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxXCp-0002Y3-4R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:23673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxXCo-0002Xz-Ud for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 01:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q745lEiW011341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 4 Aug 2012 05:47:15 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q745lE9V008757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Aug 2012 05:47:14 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt119.oracle.com (abhmt119.oracle.com [141.146.116.71]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q745lDol008071; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 00:47:13 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.171.30) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:47:13 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac1x7JIKZYV2Zn3cQW6eZE1lxsDZ1wAF3xCg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 In-Reply-To: <7b3de0ad-cdd4-4766-ad4a-7aa421bfa813@googlegroups.com> X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 141.146.126.227 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:86193 Archived-At: > > No, this degree of volatility is not expected, if > > expectation is based on past experience. This is not > > near the mean (or median or mode) of the frequency > > distribution, in my guesstimation. > > You are comparing development on the trunk shortly after the > release of a major version, when everyone commits the changes > they've had on hold for the last year or so, and goes crazy > with "trivial" cleanup changes (which are probably the cause > of much of the disruption), with the situation over the last > year or so where the focus has been on making 24.1 stable for > release. No, I did not make such a comparison. That is your imagination of my guesstimation. But thanks for playing.