Re: Tree-sitter maturity

[Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > Ideally, users should be able install the grammars separately, perhaps
  > > using their `make install' or `apt', and Emacs would only use them
  > > where they normally get installed.  That is ideal because it is not
  > > very integrated -- it preserves modularity.  In particular, it assures
  > > that the details of how they get installed are not a direct concern of
  > > Emacs maintenance.

  > Emacs needs to be built with the tree-sitter library to support the
  > modes based on it, and the grammar library needs to be installed.

That makes sense, but are we talking about two different issues?  I
though we were talking about various grammars, each for some specific
language to be parsed.  When you say "the grammar library", does it
mean those same grammars?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)