From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-o Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:18:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <14611EDD-48F7-4BEB-AACD-EDD8CB815C3A@dancol.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27693"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, luangruo@yahoo.com, acm@muc.de, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 19:19:39 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOhAJ-0006vE-Lv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 19:19:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOh9L-0007My-3V; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOh9J-0007Ml-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:18:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOh9G-0006Nc-Dp; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:18:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=/SgFaqx6neeT/qApn2eZcmXNWK+qBrD4/fQ9C1nD6UY=; b=dKcSYRFzid3j u72oeQ8TO1Jgd2hlKoamnjcSXcJFxg4sdLUvVsWIzVhMvQm3XHip5iso4swE4Mx1cMPcpo9OksBnF wKnqwhcOcaxtdAFaoX1g1dDiThteCK2bkQnNvmD70t1oHJM6jJb8wzgBen3tssQNRShAZhnlwoGRI 1Zph+TAxdi+xQ2WNoQda3jDoVU7mcDYr29ZcdespapKY8AO3+dsiTERh+wElx6IxzSm4KMdnzABxO GK4AIkeXnOAeMegutHe9XFlfLaB/bOAI7kTbzm18vbcxg2VRHscct/rO68l+FYFCuHRVx+rZL/41M YriDOiF/4OEGPQae0GsgPg==; Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOh9G-0004ph-65; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 13:18:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <14611EDD-48F7-4BEB-AACD-EDD8CB815C3A@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:47:29 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321188 Archived-At: Seeing how hard it is to agree on adding a new keybinding where none exist, can we not descend into madness where we fload ideas to modifiy things that have existed in Emacs since TECO days -- suggesting to modify C-o is a hornets nest that one shouldn't touch.