From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thanks to those implementing the new GC! Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:12:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="998"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lynn Winebarger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 11 01:13:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s5ZR3-000Ac6-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 May 2024 01:13:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5ZQ7-0004e4-K7; Fri, 10 May 2024 19:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5ZQ5-0004df-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2024 19:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5ZQ4-0001Zv-Ff; Fri, 10 May 2024 19:12:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=b1PFGiWMLIav6wOLOjxmVB12fDaC8c/gEx/AU7oqqR8=; b=KT7I3jOCykJM cvgQpQ5cytTlqkHKA9U0QMS+2vJJKvyHLCE2I+JibB/dIREKwjW/b8hd/v+xac/ph2yVPv+U+4ReK AKx0pZt2EzhS+gfN011PleirCc/LOSqQeqlMN08eCNM3ZjBiqinZWJfHUy8UXNy1v1Ra2U6rBAnyG IvnfuDnHFMLk3ScCLnmOgdcTU0vieuIUiklvHin/xI7qvZ6F0RFbY56DkfamCt6iaErP92AT0IJSN GD9ARRmY+m0sJh5bpSkvi6uSeH6UvISR/fISaIOCuDF4GWCHoXmkA9moC3m7FJaHcsBpbtapSt4WM EfOXJI9VSsuX65EcwmPzmQ==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5ZQ2-0004tl-RY; Fri, 10 May 2024 19:12:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Lynn Winebarger on Wed, 8 May 2024 20:18:05 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319156 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] I don't know if the dedicated > thread can be disabled, but even without it one would expect to get lower > pause times from incremental collection, possibly at the cost of higher > total collection times. That isn't pbvious to me -- though it might be true. Would people please benchmark this when they have a chance? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)