From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Code for cond* Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4613"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 23 04:05:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rdLrz-0000xi-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 04:05:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdLrO-0005IU-Aq; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdLrK-0005AZ-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdLrK-0000iO-5F; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=hC/2sRiCJg6OD61Q78alQJcIJ+Qnk/cUFOgpj6KltB4=; b=o0LuSdCbpFHh SbJLU+cTEVVvkGXYyyipbKVSS0DmVBiNDmBn0OycSjQPJD7cU6lM9o3DdJUOQ+QuhKyyyDkqTN3zD d/OrwU9tF9jMCkC/7CiVc1cdk8K7SkzGXzcLK8gr4gR3M8tp51BJqeZ7OEXfl4fbZnS89QPHFtojj 9hFbO1JOIKa3B+A1CxV41Xvdpcpt95RV0xEvF36H6SPoP+SvBqIPhvRMEi839nwDIQA4nMRpVAUGL iWx+/Rr0wiL8fGfKvpu438UPIyeJTfGCG5X3+Pc/GFv8A0E5tGAh3pHNuw5sTppd66z87yDec9+im KJSbzMiVQ88ArEk6DXU40g==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdLrJ-0004vp-Do; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 08:02:21 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316459 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > `:let*`? If everyone prefers this, I'll go along with that preference. But I think that name would be misleading. :bind is roughly similar to let* but they are different enough that use of the name let* for the former could cause confusion. > I don't know, but other than [...] I guess you could put some keyword > before non-branches, or at the beginning of non-branches. The current version of cond* supports both. This is described in the doc string. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)