From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jinx Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sfdnyuxc.fsf@posteo.de> <83sfdl2z26.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30735"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 01 05:12:37 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1piRfQ-0007qY-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2023 05:12:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piRep-0008JT-Ua; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piRen-0008Ix-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piRen-0007fF-DJ; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=dN05tLoTINATHGjcJHnpwEd5+VFmxXU7D+Gc2NP9Qog=; b=VsJhX84xvx3h 76itEDeN3PH6U8s5uTmyLSdGUvX1ER5qh9s8BwDrQnUPGyNGe/ckBK22+dxUR8HCZkVsPU/bE9RqM fL8MmjXswt0WxzPZXymUBk0YOc+WF9qV7mi3lr7ruijSWBu/MDn6DeQ9ivOqLbHofj/rRDl2kKWa5 GD7UpNEOALIXwdAL/z6gP+RiDZvYKW5zYkDNOhPC2fGs3ZEo00tgu93Cfa1G4tycXoYTmB2pCNcAv mbKgq/oji359FtNDYgvJrWtWyKDVMTcYIay2Kfh+JB/K4kLtd/TVOEgy+zAZkOt5ehK3FUjIAdiW8 cyXw0yr1Qa1LgPVTSDRVqQ==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piRel-0001MH-TU; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:11:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83sfdl2z26.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:51:45 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304955 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > jinx spell-checks the visible portion of the window. I don't see why > we would need that. Suppose I scroll the window by 2 lines: why would > I want the new visible portion to be spell-checked again, when the > overlap with the last check is so large? You mean, it doesn't remember which part has already been checked? I took for granted it would optimize by not rechecking what was already on the window. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)