From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jinx Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sfdnyuxc.fsf@posteo.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36945"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Eliachevitch Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 31 06:30:29 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pi6PD-0009QL-II for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 06:30:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pi6OF-000628-C6; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pi6OD-00061u-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pi6OB-0007Rk-W7; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=Qw2H+AtlHn0V8G6zNeHb9jFnmLQMS0Nl7tugRplN5tE=; b=COQQcSI5yp3+ fDzJTwrk95b5VnEc8nwi9bthGzWH3oSU9HvaVFL0aKVipQIgiVce51WiBLPIsP6a/CEAXNTXjJ80n 66cYPBngZ+yOjD9cwkKVW75RfQJKhf35McwoNBybEg7ehJSrZcVjVlJlcMiuPbGZNRYTA7Y6ZF4Ns fFL5KSSnosak88r6/gfT0NnkpuBR2pt13jaQNAbTHFBdwe4cSWKaZ4dk1s14F/mgrfJ86ewR+ueX5 wlQMiVucYpSGKrok99lwhGcIBk6o42x1RqWmmFs4oMQCOtZWlOpblowDqbR/57g3KEd/sPPxlOyGV fULDHthbs340S2htx/JI2g==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pi6OB-0007Ci-MU; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:29:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sfdnyuxc.fsf@posteo.de> (message from Michael Eliachevitch on Wed, 29 Mar 2023 22:46:01 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304883 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > But as far as I know it doesn't have yet the ability to check and > list the spelling mistakes in the entire buffer. Therefore, I will > probably still be using ispell-buffer to iterate through all > spelling errors. It was pointed out that there is a way to do this. Of course, if we install it in Emacs we could adjust the calling conventions however we think users will like. We could make `ispell-buffer' call jinx if that's what we want. Given that, do you still think you would have a need for the existing `ispell-buffer' that uses ispell.el, if jinx were always available? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)