Re: tree-sitter version?

[Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > It seems that we have a series of many pairs of major mode,
  > > FOO-mode and FOO-ts-mode, where FOO-ts-mode uses treesitter
  > > and FOO-mode does not use it.  Is that correct?

  > Yes.

  > > It is no disaster, but is this really the interface we want to use for
  > > enabling or disabling treesitter?  I am sure we can make it cleaner.

  > For now this was deemed the cleanest, safest approach, given that we lack
  > experience and user feedback.  Several other ways were proposed, but we
  > decided to delay their implementation until we understand better both what
  > users prefer and how close to one another are the two varieties.

That's reasonable.  But sine this is an interim interface,
let's explicitly announce it that way.  We could say that
people should be prepared for it to change in another Emacs
version soon.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)