From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding.
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:43:44 -0500
Message-ID: <E1lBMMy-0004I9-1W@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com>
 <SA2PR10MB4474F289D4FB3C4510DF6AE8F3B49@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus>
 <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus>
 <CADwFkmkAb4o5mztty15pkMdp1dXVrVmq+KBD5JMgV=QYOgttjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org>
 <SA2PR10MB447473C937C0CC48E7AAAB04F3B39@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <E1l7tze-0003kE-L5@fencepost.gnu.org> <5588fb25805d486be704@heytings.org>
 <SA2PR10MB447497EDC24447E5C1C2262EF3B29@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <5588fb2580d7e46863dd@heytings.org>
 <SA2PR10MB44740A3F8620986925C81974F3B29@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <5588fb2580f248753c30@heytings.org>
 <SA2PR10MB4474BDE1163AD860ACFC05D0F3B29@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <5588fb25800032b1a06a@heytings.org>
 <SA2PR10MB4474E7F43FC6529237A64A7DF3B19@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <993b9ce74de32c5450c3@heytings.org>
 <SA2PR10MB4474AC4FD4CD5C92539677ABF3B19@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <E1lATi0-0003ZI-Rn@fencepost.gnu.org> 
 <SA2PR10MB44749377E8F6233F984CBE5DF38B9@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="24157"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 20:12:25 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lBMoj-0006BG-0h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 20:12:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58588 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lBMoi-00041W-06
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:12:24 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42664)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1lBMMz-0002SM-H3
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:43:45 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42773)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1lBMMy-0004Rg-IQ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:43:45 -0500
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1lBMMy-0004I9-1W; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:43:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <SA2PR10MB44749377E8F6233F984CBE5DF38B9@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 (message from Drew Adams on Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:36:19 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264761
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/264761>

   I never suggested unbinding any keys, to reserve
   them for 3rd-party code.  I proposed that we put
   in place a moratorium on Emacs binding any more
   unbound keys, and that keys that currently are
   _not_ bound by default be reserved for 3rd-party
   code.

   The idea is that Emacs stop grabbing virgin
   territory for new default key bindings.  This
   proposal I made didn't call for unbinding any
   keys.

Drew's proposal is also a good one.