From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0rgeyju.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg62hdkc.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 06:49:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lARKP-0008py-5L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:49:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lARKN-0003rL-Os for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lARKA-0003rA-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lARKA-000278-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lARKA-0001x4-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.16131089407493 (code B ref 44834); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2021 05:49:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lARK6-0001wg-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lARK2-0001wQ-A6 for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lARJw-000205-Na; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:48 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lARJu-0005D3-VC; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83sg62hdkc.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:41:23 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199837 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Empty lines are clearly trivial, but what other examples of trivial > lines exist? Should we say "non-empty lines"? A line with just braces, or parentheses, or just a few operators, can be taken as trivial. There is no precise rule here. -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)