From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:50:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5xurt.fsf@igel.home> <87tuqtxtpw.fsf@igel.home> <83sg6d42o4.fsf@gnu.org> <83im793wbs.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9b7ri3p.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22939"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: thibaut.verron@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 06:52:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7u2K-0005qB-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 06:52:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40536 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7u2J-0002wn-To for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7u14-0000zZ-Kz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7u13-0003aK-2z; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7u0x-0003xV-WE; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:50:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83v9b7ri3p.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:02:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263940 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > > > That many modes have some kind of "revert" action. > > > > Aren't they special modes? I think they already have a standard key > > for that: g. > Some of them are special modes, but some aren't. That makes me curious; I'd like to understand how come. Can someone post about modes that have their own revert actions but are not special modes? -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)