From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Concern about new binding.
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E1l7G5O-00034z-Eb@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus>
 <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus>
 <E1l7B5G-0008A7-VZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <bc6326ff8324e652f62b@heytings.org> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="36007"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: gregory@heytings.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 12:13:45 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l7G6S-0009GL-CZ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:13:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l7G6R-00048l-7x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:13:43 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50424)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1l7G5Z-0003dk-MG
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:49 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39425)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1l7G5Z-0003pe-At; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:49 -0500
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1l7G5O-00034z-Eb; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 06:12:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Wed, 03
 Feb 2021 11:50:07 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263784
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/263784>

Why not C-x M-u for revert-buffer?  Hard to type, follows the pattern
of "undo" which revert-buffer basically is, is free, similar to the
normal pattern of Emacs bindings where M- works on something larger
than something without.