From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:53:43 -0400
Message-ID: <E1kFfwF-0002aB-1h@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com>
 <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus>
 <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru>
 <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default>
 <bcae72d9-04b1-8b78-f624-e16ffc450d59@yandex.ru>
 <E1kFWxU-0001Rk-RT@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E1kFf1E-000811-5y@fencepost.gnu.org> <87lfhkl2r4.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="35255"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nicola.manca85@gmail.com,
 dgutov@yandex.ru, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com
To: Amin Bandali <bandali@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 17:54:32 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFfx1-00094k-L8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:54:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kFfx0-0002hY-Mi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:54:30 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34932)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>) id 1kFfwI-0001hR-AB
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:53:46 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42484)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFfwG-0003Pe-Um; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:53:44 -0400
Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82)
 (envelope-from <ams@gnu.org>)
 id 1kFfwF-0002aB-1h; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:53:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <87lfhkl2r4.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Amin Bandali on Tue, 08
 Sep 2020 11:14:23 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254754
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/254754>

It seems that suggesting totally radical changes without any kind of
though is all the rage.  There are enough subtelities in how undo
works in emacs that, yes, the vast majority would find it annoying and
unusable if it was changed to something like undo-tree.