From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 01:09:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83blmu9u57.fsf@gnu.org> <7c61a272-f4ba-fdfd-755b-1a720e8cc2df@gmail.com> <838shy9srs.fsf@gnu.org> <7f820b59-ebbc-18c7-9f08-104a7ba88dd2@gmail.com> <834kslao2y.fsf@gnu.org> <052569f9-0571-6471-7a27-f3d7b36497a0@gmail.com> <83sgg58ari.fsf@gnu.org> <837dxh847w.fsf@gnu.org> <834ksl833q.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="69933"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org, ndame@protonmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 07:13:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6Bc-000I4c-3r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:13:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ6Bb-0005He-2d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:13:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ67I-0005QH-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ67H-0000Gv-S0; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ67F-0006FI-SR; Thu, 14 May 2020 01:09:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Wed, 13 May 2020 00:22:56 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250202 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Maybe we can publicize a part of the list which would not violate > privacy? When I signed my copyright papers, I answered yes to a > question that said "Would it be acceptable for us to publicize > your contribution by microblogging that you are contributing, and > listing your name in our monthly newsletter?". I think it is safe > to assume that those who answered yes to this question do not > object to appearing on a public list; correct? I think so. However, we probably didn't ask that question N years ago. Hmm. If the name of the contributor will appear publicly in the repo, I guess privacy about the name is not necessary. Maybe it is only the _other_ data in that file which we need to keep private. If so, this could be easy to solve. Eli, would you like to talk about this with people at the FSF? -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)