From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master a6b5985: Avoid duplicated character classes in rx Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:48:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20191203142243.9552.27513@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191203142246.0615C20A2B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <79A83C7D-610F-4CA4-B5E9-7F11FD8A9365@acm.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="158637"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 07 05:48:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idS1D-000f6b-7R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 05:48:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idS1C-0000Hk-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:48:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1idS15-0000HZ-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1idS15-0005VT-Fx; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1idS14-0003ZP-EA; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:48:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:49:07 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243207 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] What does Common Lisp say about the return value of 'push'? If Common Lisp describes a certain return value for 'push', people will tend to use it that way, and I think it would be a waste of time changing all code that ever depends on that return value. It would be easier to document that return value. -- Dr Richard Stallman Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)