From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34655: 26.1.92; Segfault in module with --module-assertions Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:10:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874l8r1t3a.fsf@tcd.ie> <87h8cqre8n.fsf@tcd.ie> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="227758"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34655@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 05:11:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYp-000x6f-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 05:11:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYo-0006u2-A3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:11:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYh-0006tl-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYg-0002Ay-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:11:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYg-0002AQ-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqYf-0007vw-RS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 04:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34655.155124061930418 (code B ref 34655); Wed, 27 Feb 2019 04:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2019 04:10:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53437 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqXz-0007uX-4X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqXw-0007u7-W0 for 34655@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqXr-0001ey-NX; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gyqXr-0000BU-Jp; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:10:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h8cqre8n.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155833 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Re: the name, I chose 'realpath' because the original implementation was > just that: a wrapper around realpath(3). It was only in a later version > that I switched to using canonicalize_file_name(3) instead. Perhaps a > better name would have been 'truename' or similar, but I don't think > this is important enough a matter to justify renaming it now. Do you? If you don't think it is worth publicizing, and you don't really want to use it, I won't claim that minor fixes in it are important. A good name might be nonmagic-file-truename -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)