From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31271: 25.2; exported deleted RMAIL emails should have theit deleted flag reset Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:13:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83o9hcgf0h.fsf@gnu.org> <83po19ec1r.fsf@gnu.org> <83wovd9t3v.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528215371 22380 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2018 16:16:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 16:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31271@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 18:16:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEcx-0005gs-By for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:16:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEf2-0001yE-KG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEay-00063a-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEax-00037o-IL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEax-00037Y-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEaw-0007ne-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:14:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31271 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31271-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31271.152821523829965 (code B ref 31271); Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31271) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2018 16:13:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEas-0007nF-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:13:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mx-all.isti.cnr.it ([194.119.192.3]:1470 helo=blade3.isti.cnr.it) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEaq-0007n4-Ck for 31271@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 12:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from savesent-daemon.mx-all.isti.cnr.it by mx-all.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.7-x04 #1884) id <01QTCWCKFE7KAH4RBG@mx-all.isti.cnr.it> for 31271@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:13:49 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it ([146.48.81.102]) by mx-all.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.7-x04 #1884) with ESMTPSA id <01QTCWCHYPOYAW3P7Y@mx-all.isti.cnr.it>; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:13:46 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fQEah-0003rY-PV; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 18:13:47 +0200 In-reply-to: <83wovd9t3v.fsf@gnu.org> X-INSM-ip-source: 146.48.81.102 Auth Done X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147035 Archived-At: >What about the question I asked: > >> What about invoking 'o' with a prefix argument -- should it stop >> ignoring deleted messages when it looks for the N-1 additional >> messages to output to a file, when this option is set non-nil? Sorry, I had missed that one. >The code I posted still ignores deleted messages, except for the >message that is current when the command is invoked. Is that >reasonable? I'd say it is reasonable, but I am not sure. Suggestion: when the new option is set to t, RMAIL ignores the deleted flag (that is, it goes through all messages, deleted or not) and asks for confirmation for every deleted message it meets. The archived message has its deleted flag cleared. This behaviour is not surprising, it is consistent, it does not break old macros because you have to set the new option to t.