From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Off Topic (Was Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?) Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 22:12:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526955095 23763 195.159.176.226 (22 May 2018 02:11:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 02:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tim Cross Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 22 04:11:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwlu-00064c-W7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2018 04:11:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwo2-0007EK-23 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwmz-0007DB-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwmy-0005vn-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:12:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwmx-0005v7-6l; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fKwmw-0000D5-Mr; Mon, 21 May 2018 22:12:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Tim Cross on Mon, 21 May 2018 08:24:37 +1000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225536 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Essentially, > you don't actually receive the message - instead, you receive a link to a > message and you need to open the remote link in order to read the message. I would guess that most of those servers also require nonfree JS code in order to see the message. For your freedom's sake, you should refuse to run it. What I do, when sent a message that way, is either (1) just ignore it or (2) write back explaining I won't see the message that way. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)