From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878t8lfgu3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83o9hfk311.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgcjo736.fsf@igel.home> <831sebjyb2.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmdfo2b5.fsf@igel.home> <87vabl5ech.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526786025 19816 195.159.176.226 (20 May 2018 03:13:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 03:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 20 05:13:41 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEmy-00051r-11 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2018 05:13:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEp5-0000UN-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEox-0000UE-Aj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEow-0001ju-FK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEou-0001g8-CZ; Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fKEou-00030B-17; Sat, 19 May 2018 23:15:40 -0400 In-reply-to: <87vabl5ech.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Fri, 18 May 2018 14:37:50 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225459 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > For example using gnus the setting > (setq gnus-blocked-images nil) The default value is gnus-block-private-groups, whose doc string says (defun gnus-block-private-groups (group) "Allows images in newsgroups to be shown, blocks images in all other groups." Does that create a vulnerability in some cases? Can newsgroup postings use an image to determine who reads them? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.