From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com>
Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for a new package on ELPA: Elbank
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:15:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1eR2lR-0003ix-76@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218003007.skpcai6hpaqxo6bw@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:30:07 -0500)
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> To me, it sounds like a 'bot' framework,
Is there a difference between a "bot framework" and something that allows
people to automate their communications with web services?
It appears to me this is a case of a general-purpose tool that can be used
for good or for bad. Like wget.
Is this criticism more valid for Weboob than it would be for wget?
Can you offer a constructive criticism? A way that Weboob could aid
ethical uses more and unethical uses less?
which would make FSF/ELPA enablers
> for the type anti-social web-izens
No it wouldn't. Even supposing that your criticism were valid for
Weboob -- which has not been demonstrated -- it would not be valid for
our program, Elbank, which would use Weboob only for doing a
legitimate job.
that have lead us all to suffer all forms
> of captcha.
I see no reason to think Elbank would have that effect.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-15 9:56 Proposal for a new package on ELPA: Elbank Nicolas Petton
2017-12-15 15:49 ` raman
2017-12-16 22:24 ` Richard Stallman
2017-12-17 0:01 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-17 22:21 ` Richard Stallman
2017-12-18 0:30 ` Boruch Baum
2017-12-18 21:15 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2017-12-18 9:20 ` Rasmus
2017-12-18 10:37 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-20 15:51 ` Phillip Lord
2017-12-20 16:30 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-18 21:15 ` Richard Stallman
2017-12-18 23:09 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-19 23:01 ` Richard Stallman
2017-12-19 23:20 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-20 12:58 ` Nicolas Petton
2017-12-21 16:49 ` Richard Stallman
2017-12-20 22:28 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1eR2lR-0003ix-76@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=boruch_baum@gmx.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=nicolas@petton.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.