From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8737aac0rb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <7s37aapc4g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fue7c32j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2xrl8kp.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9su8xds.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499679219 21171 195.159.176.226 (10 Jul 2017 09:33:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, ken.manheimer@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 10 11:33:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV4P-0005Be-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:33:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV4V-0004eT-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV28-00034C-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV27-00056f-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV1C-0004RY-KN; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dUV1B-0000xn-BO; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:30:13 -0400 In-reply-to: <87o9su8xds.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216404 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Yes. The copyright assignment process says "I assign copyright for > Emacs"; obviously this makes sense, but if someone is doing this so that > we can get magit into Emacs or ELPA, then we need to know that also, so > we can work out when a new assignment happens which package (i.e. magit) > it has implications for. We have had a system for this for a long time. > Say we have 200 contributors for magit, and 500 people with copyright > assignment for Emacs. New assignment comes in for Emacs, I now have to > check 200 magit contributors to see whether its one of them. Since the assignment clerk knows which papers are for Magit, he should be able to inform you of this directly. > It's also worth remembering here: copyright assignment works based on > peoples names, while the list of contributors for magit that I have is > based on their github names, or the email(s) that they used for their > git commits. Doesn't the Magit repository record contributors' official names? If not, I am sure we can arrange to tell the assignment clerk each signer's email address and/or repository name, and include that in the notification message to maintainers. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.