From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com> <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ins2jq88.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg2p8swx.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831sypjmst.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpggip8j.fsf@gnu.org> <05ba947a-970a-178c-8036-bcdf84485384@cs.ucla.edu> <20161107134942.0e418fa4@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478613680 19569 195.159.176.226 (8 Nov 2016 14:01:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Perry E. Metzger" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 15:01:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c46x5-0000ci-Rp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 15:00:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33196 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c46x8-00020g-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 09:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c46sA-00076g-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c46s9-0004Jk-Lr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c46s4-0004FU-Vg; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c46rz-0002yd-5E; Tue, 08 Nov 2016 08:55:23 -0500 In-reply-to: <20161107134942.0e418fa4@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> (perry@piermont.com) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209284 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > It is not likely. There is statistical information that was > cited earlier in this thread. Windows 9x and ME are now below 0.01% > usage. How much below is hard to measure. It seems I was mistaken in what I remembered. Maybe it was Windows XP that was still being installed a few years ago. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.