From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvhruyrh.fsf@gnu.org> <83r36zr75f.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477759118 29815 195.159.176.226 (29 Oct 2016 16:38:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 16:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 18:38:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WeK-0006Vn-Bk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 18:38:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55304 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WeM-0007z3-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:38:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WdV-0007yd-6J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WdU-0002dH-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WdT-0002co-Ct; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c0WdS-0005GO-PM; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:37:34 -0400 In-reply-to: <83r36zr75f.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:39:08 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208961 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > I just did 'time temacs -batch -l loadup'. It took over 18 seconds. > > We have a long way to go to make that fast enough. > Try the patch I pointed to in a previous message, and see what kind of > speedup is possible by 2 simple measures. It would be a lot of work for me to try that myself, and I think it is not necessary if you already tried it. What fractional speedup did you observe when you tried it? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.