From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:24:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87twe6sx2g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvhruyrh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477531548 8246 195.159.176.226 (27 Oct 2016 01:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 01:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 03:25:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZRK-0005gm-Cr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 03:25:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZRM-0007Wl-TX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:25:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZR1-0007Lo-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZR1-000878-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:24:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZQs-0007uF-4S; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bzZQr-0000fi-AT; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:24:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <83mvhruyrh.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:37:38 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208862 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > If not, then I hope we can design, with the Glibc developers, a > > different set of hooks to allow us to make unexec work. > Frankly, I think that ship has sailed, and cannot be turned around. I think that is an exaggeration. They got rid of ONE set of hooks for specific practical reasons. Maybe we can design a different set of hooks which do the job and which are not a problem for them to support. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.