Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows

["Francesco Potortì" <pot@gnu.org>]

>
>> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:28:21 -0700
>> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
>> CC: pot@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> 
>> I don't see why it's worth our trouble to substitute one incorrect 
>> solution for another, if it's OK that the solutions are approximate.
>
>It's OK if we don't want to include back in the test suite the files
>with DOS EOLs that caused the trouble in the first place.  If we don't
>care about that subtle feature, I'm OK with the current code.  After
>all, it worked nicely until now.

However, if in fact Emacs works the same on all platforms, maybe there
is no reason for Etags to compensate for differences that do not exist
(any more?).  In fact, as back as I can go with the etags.c sources, I
see that code has always been there, so unless I'm mistaken it's very
very old.

If what I write is correct, I'd go with removeing the different
treatment of crlf on dos and unix.