From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: .info files Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831uns3rgj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ams@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334832293 11041 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2012 10:44:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:44:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 19 12:44:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKor1-0003dh-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 12:44:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKor0-0002np-Ol for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKoqu-0002fd-4w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKoqp-00082S-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKoqp-00082N-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKoql-0007wJ-U2; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:44:31 -0400 In-reply-to: <831uns3rgj.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:34:52 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149811 Archived-At: > But that raises the question of files that contain no nodes, > specifically no Top node, i.e. output from: > > \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*- > @setfilename hello-info-world.info > @settitle Hello info world > @bye The only reasonable thing in such files is to show the entire file. Which it does, with an error though.. > Though makeinfo should probobly warn/fail if there is no Top node. Why should it? Users should be free to do that if they want to. It is useful for various reasons to have at least a Top node.