From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11068: 24.0.94; Face-remapped background does not extend to end of window Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1BE52A40-0403-433F-8164-DFDBD6771F80@gmail.com> <83ty1fvc28.fsf@gnu.org> <83obrmtbsy.fsf@gnu.org> <87ty1ekrqy.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehsit63e.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx75z8n6.fsf@gnu.org> <83ty1ds4ye.fsf@gnu.org> <87398x19rq.fsf@gnu.org> <83iphssh51.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx74xai0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332790623 10858 80.91.229.3 (26 Mar 2012 19:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: darthandrus@gmail.com, 11068@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 21:37:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFir-0007Pc-6W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46156 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFiq-0006s7-JR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFin-0006ru-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFil-0002JA-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFik-0002J2-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGCv-0000ip-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11068 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11068.13327924262708 (code B ref 11068); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2012 20:07:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGC2-0000hd-AT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:60787) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCGC0-0000hW-EP for 11068@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCFhn-0004gz-5l; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:35:51 -0400 In-reply-to: <87mx74xai0.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Chong Yidong on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:16:23 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58172 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: darthandrus@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 11068@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:16:23 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Is that final, or do you want to hear from Stefan, or think about it? > > I've thought about it, and after staring at the code I'm pretty sure it > does the right thing. If the extra glyphs break anything, we have a > regression bug on our hands for R2L lines anyway. So I'll vouch for the > change. Please go ahead and commit the fixed patch ASAP. OK. "ASAP" will happen in a couple of days in this case: my main development machine just died, after 7 years of continuous service, and the heir is expected the day after tomorrow.