From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10578: 24.0.92; No png images on OpenSUSE 12.1 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87y5sz1ztp.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <83k44j3djg.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipk339sj.fsf@gnu.org> <83hazn38tp.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwf731y8.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5svinp8.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327556626 17932 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 05:43:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 10578@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 06:43:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7W-0000US-Qa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:43:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58525 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7W-0002qy-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7R-0002qd-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7Q-0007kE-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7Q-0007kA-Sq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7u-0005iR-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10578 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10578-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10578.132755662321937 (code B ref 10578); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10578) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 05:43:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7Z-0005hl-Ut for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:60298 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI7T-0005ha-N6 for 10578@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqI6y-0006iT-Je; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:43:04 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:26:43 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56027 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:26:43 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 10578@debbugs.gnu.org > > all warnings of type `display' are assumed to be equivalent and only > the most recent one is displayed; the rest are discarded. Why not the first one? More often than not, the others, if different, will be the consequences of the first one, which is the root cause. And if they are all identical, it doesn't matter which one you show ;-)