From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Changes in epaths.in
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:38 -0500
Message-ID: <E1RkUJ8-0000c8-PU@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326173511 25572 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 05:31:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:31:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 06:31:45 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RkUJE-0006tn-MS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:31:44 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38146 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1RkUJD-000122-Qi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:43 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45389)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RkUJB-00011w-Bo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:42 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1RkUJA-0001Mg-DI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:41 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:34575)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RkUJA-0001Mc-AF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:40 -0500
Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1RkUJ8-0000c8-PU; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:31:38 -0500
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147547
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/147547>

  2012-01-10  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>

	  * epaths.in (PATH_LOADSEARCH, PATH_DUMPLOADSEARCH, PATH_EXEC)
	  (PATH_DATA, PATH_DOC): Update the template values to be closer to
	  their typical values these days.

Is it really wise to make changes in basic Emacs configuration during
a pretest?  E.g., the change to PATH_DUMPLOADSEARCH looks non trivial
to me, and I cannot immediately assess its effects (if you can, I
would suggest to at least put it in writing in the ChangeLog entry).

This isn't a bugfix, is it?  If so, can it wait?