From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10464: 24.0.92; mouse highlight regression Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ty45kwop.fsf@gnu.org> <83lipgeh5x.fsf@gnu.org> <87wr90qjbd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326173214 24734 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 05:26:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10464@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 06:26:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUET-0004wz-Pw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:26:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUET-0000pN-AS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUEQ-0000pI-Dn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUEP-0000VE-4g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUEP-0000VA-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUEg-0000Rm-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10464 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10464-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10464.13261731901682 (code B ref 10464); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10464) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2012 05:26:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUE9-0000R5-8y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:32856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUE6-0000Qv-25 for 10464@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkUDn-0000PN-VC; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:26:07 -0500 In-reply-to: <87wr90qjbd.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Chong Yidong on Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:21:10 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55603 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: 10464@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:21:10 +0800 > > When the mouse is over the XXX, the highlight only extends to the end of > the text, whereas it's expected to go to the end of the line. This is > the case where there's an overlay with "XXX\n" as the display string and > a mouse face. I will look into it, but (compatibility with Emacs 23 aside) how important is it to have the entire display line come up in mouse color in this case? I could make an argument that what we do in Emacs 24 is actually better, since the newline is not shown on display as any tangible glyph. IOW, are there practical use cases where this difference matters?