From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GnuTLS for W32 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:11 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vcosskhc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <831urgr2yr.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4zgsh2w.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ipks3zbo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87boqk3q69.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87aa634st8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fwfvsgfv.fsf@wanadoo.es> <877h17scdo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87hb0b77nr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739bvs27m.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87ty4b4329.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb0b3yoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <6ED011D5-E185-44C6-BB31-A445A4E5F83A@gmail.com> <87wr976otx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325772872 12105 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2012 14:14:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:14:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 05 15:14:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio5J-0005cW-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:14:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio5I-0007dN-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio5B-0007dA-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio56-0001v6-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:48956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio56-0001v0-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rio55-0007zg-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:14:11 -0500 In-reply-to: <87ipkq6yy5.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:50:10 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147341 Archived-At: > From: Ted Zlatanov > Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:50:10 -0500 > > Do you agree with the general idea of checking for critical updates > on startup, though? I have nothing against it, provided that it's not a nuisance (e.g., I don't always want to go on-line when I start Emacs). > I would actually also like to bundle trusted certificates. Where should they be gotten and how to integrate them with GnuTLS? > Right now, gnutls.el will take a list of trustfiles or default to > /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt, which is hardly ideal for all > platforms. That directory most probably won't exist on Windows. > If we tell the user to reinstall because GnuTLS is out of date, would > that be a big burden? It could be, since Emacs is a large distribution, and GnuTLS libraries are much smaller in comparison.