From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory again Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:04:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324386309 22342 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2011 13:05:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: emacs user Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 20 14:05:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RczNP-0005Qp-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:05:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46979 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RczNO-0003tR-B9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RczNE-0003tH-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RczN1-00017u-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:04:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:51893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RczN1-00017q-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:04:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RczN1-0006fO-GI; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:04:39 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from emacs user on Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:05:20 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146873 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:05:20 +0200 > From: emacs user > > >> thanks!  here it is.  I attach both the leaks output, and the > >> backtrace/ xbacktrace for a crash that happens eventually. > >> At the time of this leaks report, emacs has 192Mb according to the > >> activity monitor, with all buffers deleted. happy to do additional > >> tests if needed. > > > > Please set MallocStackLogging in the environment, and run this again. > > Without the call-stack info, I find it hard to believe we will be able > > to correlate these leaks with source code. > > > > Thanks. > > thanks for this hint, here it is, at least the first few entries: Thank you. Looks like all of these leaks are NS-specific, if I understand the information correctly.