From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory again Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324367043 23396 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2011 07:44:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: emacs user Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 20 08:43:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMg-0006g4-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:43:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMg-0007oM-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMd-0007o6-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMc-0004gO-Lu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMc-0004g7-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcuMc-0004QH-Gx; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:43:54 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from emacs user on Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:34:44 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146869 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:34:44 +0200 > From: emacs user > > > I'm not an expert in Apple world, but the first step looks almost obvious - > > can you try to use 'leaks' (for example, see http://shorestreet.com/node/4) > > and see whether it shows something useful? > > > > Dmitry > > > > thanks! here it is. I attach both the leaks output, and the > backtrace/ xbacktrace for a crash that happens eventually. > At the time of this leaks report, emacs has 192Mb according to the > activity monitor, with all buffers deleted. happy to do additional > tests if needed. Please set MallocStackLogging in the environment, and run this again. Without the call-stack info, I find it hard to believe we will be able to correlate these leaks with source code. Thanks.