From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-g crash in C-x C-f (OSX Lion) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4EEB48B2.9090602@swipnet.se> <83liqc1tac.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwgk1atk.fsf@gnu.org> <838vmb1tu6.fsf@gnu.org> <54BDFFDD-C0D2-4242-94D8-91D988B74283@swipnet.se> <87wr9tj6o2.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324293671 29343 80.91.229.12 (19 Dec 2011 11:21:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 19 12:21:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbHF-000292-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:21:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36288 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbHE-0001Ob-OP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:21:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbHA-0001OJ-V6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbH6-0003fq-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbH6-0003fm-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:20:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RcbH5-0006IG-EW; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:20:55 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Carsten Mattner on Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:59:40 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146817 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:59:40 +0100 > From: Carsten Mattner > Cc: Jan Djärv , > Emacs developers > > > Tastes differ, but I think you are nuts if you prefer gdb command > > language scripting to Python! > > Yes, but from a simplicity and size perspective Lua (even though I > don't like it and wouldn't recommend it) would be better choice. Funny you should mention this. See the discussion that started here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-02/msg00065.html I surely hope you were part of that discussion!