From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory again Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4ED0F945.5090805@yandex.ru> <83pqge7syw.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxb6tkji.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323177181 15793 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2011 13:13:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Carsten Mattner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 14:12:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupN-0003x8-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupM-0006fW-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupJ-0006ck-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupI-0005JI-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:35649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupI-0005JC-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXupH-000676-Tf; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:12:51 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Carsten Mattner on Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:35:09 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146502 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:35:09 +0100 > From: Carsten Mattner > Cc: Óscar Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Any ready-made instrumentation to reveal what's going on for find > the root cause or explanation of what's going? I'm not aware of any existing instrumentation. Maybe someone else can help. Failing that, perhaps some tool that can show detailed memory usage and allows to find, for each memory region, its corresponding C symbol, could be used to find out which one(s) are holding on to the supposedly free memory in your use case.