From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 32 -> 64 bits on Win32 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8362ifbgf0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321869800 32024 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2011 10:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 11:03:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiV-00046P-Se for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45459 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiV-0001h9-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiO-0001gm-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiK-0002B2-DU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiK-0002Ay-C7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSQiK-0005wx-A5; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:03:00 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Fabrice Popineau on Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:16:48 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146108 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:16:48 +0100 > > > How much physical memory would a typical 64-bit Windows box have? I'd > > say set the reserved heap size to twice that much. If the page file > > size is something like 1.5 to 2 times the size of physical RAM, > > Windows will probably refuse a larger reservation anyway. > > > > No it doesn't. [...] I have a 4Gb machine and I have been able to > reserve about 540Gb. So the question is : with a 64 bits emacs, > where do you start ? If you can reserve 1/2 TB, let's start with that. We can increase it later if people complain ;-) > if we prefer to stick with "small" address space. We don't. But thanks for the reference.