From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding objects on C stack - alternate GCPRO Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4EC38B72.1000101@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321441587 27156 80.91.229.12 (16 Nov 2011 11:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:06:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 16 12:06:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJt-0003Xh-H8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:06:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58911 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJt-0006kk-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJn-0006f1-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJm-0008RA-Ps for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJm-0008R5-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RQdJm-0004Vq-L7; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:14 -0500 In-reply-to: <4EC38B72.1000101@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Antipov on Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:07:46 +0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146057 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:07:46 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > > Everyone agrees that GGPROs are ugly and painful. Given that most platforms make GCPRO and UNGCPRO a no-op (and the only 2 platforms that don't are probably simply not maintained enough and don't use GCC anyway), why is this important enough to waste energy on it?