From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10035: Crash in check_x_frame in w32fns.c Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4EBFE25E.3010101@gmail.com> <838vnkeybb.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC022EB.2030508@gmail.com> <8339drg4dy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5vje4qh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321269826 19632 80.91.229.12 (14 Nov 2011 11:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, 10035@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 12:23:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudU-0000ZO-2X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:23:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudQ-0006qP-Sr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudO-0006qK-Cd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudN-0002vh-Dh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudN-0002vZ-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudu-0006Z2-4z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10035.132126983825222 (code B ref 10035); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2011 11:23:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudq-0006Yl-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudo-0006Ye-Ph for 10035@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPudH-0001w4-JB; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:23:23 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:57:17 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:24:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53890 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:57:17 +0100 > Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, 10035@debbugs.gnu.org > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:56, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Please show the info I asked Christoph to provide. > > (gdb) p a->enabled_p > $1 = 1 > (gdb) p b->enabled_p > $2 = 1 > (gdb) prowx a > y=75 x=0 pwid=320 a+d=12+3=15 phys=12+3=15 vis=15 L=0 T=40 R=0 > start=419 end=459 ENA DISP > (gdb) prowx b > y=75 x=0 pwid=320 a+d=12+3=15 phys=12+3=15 vis=15 L=0 T=40 R=0 > start=419 end=459 ENA DISP > (gdb) pgrowx a > TEXT: 40 glyphs Thanks. The 2 glyph rows are identical, AFAICS. The last (I hope ;-) piece of the puzzle is this: (gdb) p a->hash (gdb) p b->hash