From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Your changes in revision 106240 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d3df8qod.fsf@gnu.org> <4EACBA10.9010007@cs.ucla.edu> <4EACE96E.9070800@cs.ucla.edu> <4EACF996.5000609@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319959637 19834 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2011 07:27:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 08:27:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnU-0000ri-Qh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:27:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44554 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnT-0000wB-Vg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnR-0000w5-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnQ-0005tE-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:50194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnQ-0005tA-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKPnP-00072c-WB; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:27:08 -0400 In-reply-to: <4EACF996.5000609@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:15:34 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145795 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:15:34 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > We should avoid arbitrary limits on the lengths of data structures. It's not arbitrary. It is unreasonable to ask GDB to display a list that is longer than a small number of items.