From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Your changes in revision 106240 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d3df8qod.fsf@gnu.org> <4EACBA10.9010007@cs.ucla.edu> <4EACE96E.9070800@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319956094 3384 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2011 06:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 06:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 30 07:28:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsM-0005yY-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:28:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56050 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsL-0003VV-E2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsH-0003V9-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsG-0005kW-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsG-0005kS-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKOsG-0004PO-1U; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:28:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <4EACE96E.9070800@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:06:38 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145791 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:06:38 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Actually, there's a direct connection to EMACS_INT. > That integer gives an upper bound on the length of the list FOUND. And using `int' makes sure we never exceed that upper bound.