From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8562: Emacs 23.1 and later don't work in windows 98 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:53:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d3k88k6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83wri4kpwb.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3j9e2pn.fsf@gnu.org> <8339k3esws.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrhed91s.fsf@gnu.org> <838vtscbeu.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwvc1eq.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwsf2ra.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4d6fuph.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqmve2s2.fsf@gnu.org> <837h92dqai.fsf@gnu.org> <83r579c6wn.fsf@gnu.org> <8362ohcrht.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehyxc6ts.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319727264 21354 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 14:54:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8562@debbugs.gnu.org To: oslsachem Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 16:54:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRLX-0005MV-Sm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:54:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRLX-0007eZ-GU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:54:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRLT-0007e6-6f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRLS-0007Hs-73 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRLS-0007Hm-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRNC-0001ix-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8562.13197273406597 (code B ref 8562); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2011 14:55:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRMq-0001iL-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRMl-0001iC-RJ for 8562@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJRL0-0007U7-Kq; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:53:46 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from oslsachem on Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:46:01 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:56:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53209 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:46:01 +0200 > From: oslsachem > Cc: 8562@debbugs.gnu.org > > Sorry for the late reply, I haven't checked this email address for weeks. No worries. > As far as I can tell, the patched Emacs works perfectly when using > emacs.exe (and runemacs.exe with unicows.dll). Thanks. > However, when using runemacs.exe without unicows.dll, the program > doesn't show the error dialog window or the application window and the > process stays hidden in the background instead of exiting gracefully. Which process stays hidden -- the original runemacs.exe or emacs.exe that is run by runemacs.exe?