From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9671: 24.0.50; Two bidi crashes Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83obxwqx03.fsf@gnu.org> <9726D990-8E8E-4013-99F1-E479848B8246@gmail.com> <83mxdgqvrr.fsf@gnu.org> <77D6525D-E49A-4E04-848D-045D6650A33C@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317900501 26998 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 11:28:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9671@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Reitter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 13:28:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7O-0001Ss-Dm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:28:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57869 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7L-0007uv-Bf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7H-0007u1-Mc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7G-0006Le-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51185) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7G-0006La-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7O-0003aQ-Cv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9671.131790046813766 (code B ref 9671); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 11:27:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm7A-0003Zz-NP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm78-0003Zt-TS for 9671@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBm70-0007ey-22; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:27:38 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from David Reitter on Thu, 6 Oct 2011 06:40:07 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52268 Archived-At: > From: David Reitter > Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 06:40:07 -0400 > Cc: 9671@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't know if the second crash was related. The submitter did not supply an explanation. Good, so I didn't miss anything. But what about the crash in bidi_initialize? Can it be explained by something similar to what you saw under GDB run from another instance of Emacs? Or is that crash a mystery as well?