From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9571: 24.0.50; user option to turn off bidi, please Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8362kjsjsk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ty83qq3e.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehz7qbts.fsf@gnu.org> <834o02t4tg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqipoios.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316908358 13310 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2011 23:52:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9571@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 01:52:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1J-0005xl-SW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:52:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1J-0007Kr-5N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1G-0007KU-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1D-0002XZ-UC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1D-0002WS-Ji for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1l-0006tw-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9571 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 9571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9571.131690837926520 (code B ref 9571); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2011 23:52:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1i-0006tg-9L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c1f-0006tZ-PZ for 9571@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7c16-0004tU-KS; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:52:20 -0400 In-reply-to: <83pqipoios.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:15:47 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 19:53:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51802 Archived-At: I don't think modifying entries in a char-table creates a new one. It just modifies entries in the existing one. Perhaps Handa-san could comment on that. It would be terribly unclean to change that data structure globally rather than make a copy. And it would affect all buffers at once. This ought to be a per-buffer feature. It could be done, but why hard-code in C what can be done in Lisp? Because there is only one thing to be done, and it is so simple in C. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/