From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr: conflicting tags: mh-e-doc-8.3 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:03:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <75k49315wb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E79F773.8010005@cornell.edu> <83ty86rljf.fsf@gnu.org> <4E79FD55.4040702@cornell.edu> <83r53arkoq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316693055 318 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2011 12:04:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 14:04:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0g-0005Da-M6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:04:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0f-0000NB-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:04:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0Z-0000Mp-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0T-0006MO-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0T-0006MK-S7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:03:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6i0T-0003WE-Pz; Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:03:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Andy Moreton on Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:14:54 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144185 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:14:54 +0100 > > > It's not an error. It isn't even in the log file. > > If it's not an error, why does bzr complain every time then ? I don't know. I meant "no error" in the sense that this doesn't prevent bzr from doing what you asked it to. > Either it is reporting a problem with the repository that requires > attention from the user, or it is a bug in bzr that neees fixing. You are encouraged to report this to the bzr bug tracker.