From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `isearch-allow-scroll' - a misnomer and a bad design Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20110909215255.GD2733@acm.acm> <7002A9DA9A804F0B9F6F251FD3A2B263@us.oracle.com> <20110911103940.GA3246@acm.acm> <3C4B7E318EB04AE4B7DB9FD0E4C67629@us.oracle.com> <20110911173012.GA3088@acm.acm> <20110912093651.GA3249@acm.acm> <20110913142732.GB3081@acm.acm> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315944313 25906 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2011 20:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 22:05:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE9-0006Eh-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:05:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE8-0002nG-RI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43193) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE5-0002m4-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE4-0005ht-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:37748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE4-0005hp-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3ZE4-0005LA-EY; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:05:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <20110913142732.GB3081@acm.acm> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:27:32 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143995 Archived-At: I don't think there will be any inconvenience at all. Unless the user sets the option, isearch will behave exactly as it has done. If the default is the current behavior, I guess the other option can't hurt. I could not understand from this text > Presumably you'd be OK if the stay-in-isearch behaviour was guarded by > an option (default off)? what the default would be. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/