From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9480: 24.0.50; (vc-git) stash@{n} - requires shell quoting? Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:56:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <81sjo2fd8o.fsf@gmail.com> <81d3f6t9jn.fsf@gmail.com> <81d3f680oc.fsf@gmail.com> <874o0iq8rj.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315828676 780 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2011 11:57:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9480@debbugs.gnu.org, Jambunathan K To: Antoine Levitt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 12 13:57:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3591-0001EN-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:57:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46451 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3590-0005JU-GC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R358x-0005Ii-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:57:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R358v-0002Mu-ON for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R358v-0002Mq-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R35D8-0001pB-8Q; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9480 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9480.13158288666953 (code B ref 9480); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2011 12:01:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R35CE-0001o5-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R35CC-0001nz-IE for 9480@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R357z-0006qA-8e; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:56:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <874o0iq8rj.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Antoine Levitt on Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:50:56 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:02:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51057 Archived-At: > From: Antoine Levitt > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:50:56 +0200 > > 12/09/11 13:22, Jambunathan K > >> Yes, I see the problem, but now I wonder how come users of Posix > >> platforms didn't see it. Does it happen if your shell-file-name is > >> set to "sh", not "bash" (assuming the Cygwin Bash comes with such an > >> executable or a link)? > > > > sh and bash are apparently one and the same executable. > > Bash runs in sh compatibility mode when invoked with "sh". From man bash: > > If bash is invoked with the name sh, it tries to mimic the > startup behavior of historical versions of sh as closely as > possible, while conforming to the POSIX standard as well. Right. So results could be different, even though it's the same binary. Jambunathan, please try that if you can.